James Laverack
James Laverack
Hi @fromanirh, A friendly reminder that **Code freeze is 3 days away**, March 9th EOD PST Any enhancements that are NOT code complete by the freeze will be removed from...
Hey @alculquicondor, v1.22 Enhancements Lead here. We had this enhancement marked as "at risk" going into code freeze, but were satisfied that https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/98238 was approved and just awaiting merge, which...
@ahg-g Just to follow up here too, we discussed in Slack and this was due to a delay in reviewing. We've now marked this as "Tracked" on the [enhancements spreadsheet...
Hi @ahg-g, Since your Enhancement is scheduled to be in 1.21, please keep in mind the important upcoming dates: * Tuesday, March 9th: Week 9 — Code Freeze * Tuesday,...
Hi @ahg-g Enhancements team is currently tracking the following PRs - https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/99163 As this PR is merged, can we mark this enhancement complete for code freeze or do you have...
/milestone clear
Hi @stafwag-idirect. To clarify, I'm not a member of Improbable but I am one of the authors of this operator. I can't speak to Improbable's ongoing intent. @adamhosier and @cheahjs...
Yeah with #76 this might get _interesting_.
Hi @stafwag-idirect. We use [kustomize](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize) for deployment so we don't publish a Helm chart no.
Needs to test that changing the `spec.template.metadata` on the `ReplicaSet` does not recreate the underlying pods, because that would be bad for etcd.