Jake Wharton
Jake Wharton
Well, zero-overhead in the common (single observer) case.
There is already an issue tracking that. On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:06 PM marcinsus wrote: > In some of cases rxBinging allows to multiple observable at a time...
Call .share() on the returned observable. Using a subject is wasteful here. On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:28 AM Alexandr wrote: > As a workaround you can use hot...
Call publish(), set up your multiple subscriptions, and then call connect(). Or you can use .share() so long as all the subscriptions are made right away. On Thu, Oct 12,...
Yes On Tue, Dec 3, 2019, 3:11 AM dubeyvivek57 wrote: > Can we add RxView.clicks() and RxView.longClicks() on a same view with > same time. > > — > You...
Hmm I mean this observable doesn't do much. It just attaches a draw listener to the view tree observer and emits whenever a callback happens. The test for it passes...
The information provided is the same information that is available to the callback. So if you were using a long click listener callback directly you wouldn't have any touch information....
Weird. I will try to take a look at some point, but I can't promise it'll be super soon.
Also: I don't use this feature. That's probably why it's broken!
Another fix would just be to implement a subset of the stream API in the runtime. Then we don't have to rewrite anything...