Jake Wharton

I would not be happy with that change as proposed. There's no longer a way for the downstream code to know if the event was handled or not when the...

That overload already exists: `RxView.touches(view, e -> false)`

Ugh, UI testing Android blows... ``` com.jakewharton.processphoenix.ProcessPhoenixTest > triggerRebirthWithIntentCreatesNewProcessUsingIntent[test(AVD) - 4.3.1] FAILED android.support.test.uiautomator.UiObjectNotFoundException: UiSelector[TEXT=Restart Process with Intent] at android.support.test.uiautomator.UiObject.click(UiObject.java:412) ```

You can infer this from the [change log](https://github.com/JakeWharton/RxBinding/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md), but I agree it's not the best documentation. Basically: * RxBinding 1.x (written in Java) --> RxJava 1.x * RxBinding 2.x (written...

I remember writing this in a hurry because people were contributing methods with wild names. I don't think I proof-read it and just pushed it up and then closed a...

It's only one instance per view listener. If you do `RxView.clicks` twice on the same view, only the second one will actually receive events. We can improve the wording.

How would you detect it? A strict mode-like feature would be interesting, but it's not easy to consume debug versions of libraries as remote dependencies. On Fri, Sep 18, 2015,...

Let me get caught up on other PRs before we take this further. I've been busy on other things and need to clean out some backlog first. On Mon, Sep...

Because 99% of the time you only need one and I don't want the overhead of multiple listener support for all those cases just to support a 1% use. You...

I have a zero-overhead plan to fix this. Hoping to get something prototyped soon.