JakeQZ
JakeQZ
> This test now passes without any changes to the code on `main`, so I think this can be closed. Thanks for checking up on this. I recall a few...
The current behaviour is sort-of by design, but I agree should be improved. It assumes that a comment preceding a `Rule` is commenting that `Rule` (and is not a commented-out...
> I'd prefer we replace the union type with a shared interface. I was thinking that. I just wrote the union as shorthand.
Hmm... We also need to support this kind of construct: ```css p { /* This is a comment for the declaration */ font-size: 14px; /* smaller than usual */ /*...
> We also need to support this kind of construct: #1505 will potentially allow for trailing comments on the same line to be correctly associated.
> > To resolve these issues, I think we would need to modify `RuleSet` so that the list of `Rule`s can be a list of `Rule|Comment`s. > > I'd prefer...