Infernio

So, progress update: in the middle of untangling some CBash nonsense in `multitweaks_names`, I noticed that the MGEF indexing PBash does is broken (doesn't cache correctly), so that's getting fixed...

@Utumno Just thought I'd let you know that I'm doing some pretty heavy refactoring on the tweakers, so those will conflict badly soon :P Currently at: ``` 28 files changed,...

> I hated that key attribute, that sometimes also serves for the tweak's record sigs You mean that `self.key` mess in `multitweak_names`? Yeah, that's gone :)

Crappy premature testing with only two tweaks suggests that my tweak rework, which I've termed 'tweak pooling', is quite a bit faster: ``` 0:00:50.868 # nightly 0:00:40.711 # inf-312-tweak-pooling ```...

Better comparison, the previous one had the Contents Checker and Tweak Settings enabled as well: ``` 0:00:27.333 # nightly 0:00:08.678 # inf-312-tweak-pooling ``` Whew, that is a *lot* faster 👀

Always fun when some bugs you never knew existed disappear during refactoring and you only notice when comparing the before and after 😄 `Tweak Names` was unable to replace quest...

Will push in a bit, still need to finish up tweak settings and the race tweaks.

I'm fairly certain by now that this isn't a leak in any traditional sense, but a 'feature' of CPython. I notice the same thing with my rewritten mod checker as...

> WB isn't going to work on those and there's been no genuine talk of getting it to do that. Not sure if you missed it, but @Utumno and I...

Well, we need an early boot file. It doesn't have to be an INI. INIs have the problem that their format isn't standardized, so I'd much rather use something like...