IceCodeNew
IceCodeNew
After @rootmelo92118 finish reviewing, pls let me know. I would like to be envolved and to do the final decision on this PR.
I will take a look at it.
https://images.chainguard.dev/directory/image/harbor-registry/specifications there is already a distroless version of the _registry_ image, you may take a look at it ;-)
我看明白了,其实这个是有道理的。我印象中好像我以前也修过……我得翻翻历史记录看看后来是不是有什么问题
DNS 相关的问题都是下游的 fork 引入的,那个也已经修复了 目前我没看到不应该做这个修复的理由,我会先自己测试一段时间,然后来允许相关的修复 pr 合并
Further process requested, #2259 shoule be a good example.
After @rootmelo92118 finish reviewing, pls let me know. I would like to be envolved and to do the final decision on this PR.