HaRoLd

There are 3 problems I'm thinking of: 1. Hiding total values, e.g. so you cannot see transfer of value on a ledger, only total input and total output from the...

But what if you wanted to use denominations that aren't 1 ether? e.g. you can deposit any amount, transfer any amount to anybody, and withdraw any amount? That would require...

Apologies for hijacking the thread, but have you seen https://github.com/HarryR/ethsnarks-miximus ?

If the secret and salt are incremented, then providing any secret to anybody else (as required by the protocol) would reveal all future secrets that the person will use, which...

http://jmoiron.net/blog/python-serialization/ Ultimately for compatibility JSON encoding rather than pickling seems like the natural choice, the problem with pickle is that it's inherently tied Python.

The additional overhead of ORAM in comparison to the current access scheme is significant enough that enabling it by default may hinder performance too much in comparison with the current...

I agree, without returning the new value the atomic functions are useless in a lot of situations. When they don't return the new value you have to do a `get`,...

iirc it was waiting for protocol changes or something like that isn't as simple as it looks. It was possibly discussed in detail by rescrv on the lists at some...

This also means that signatures are malleable. Anybody, who observes an existing signature, can derive a new public key and `s` parameter for the same message and `R`, to spoof...

Example: ```bash dd if=/dev/urandom of=test bs=1M count=1 key=`charm encrypt test test.encrypted` charm decrypt test.encrypted test.decrypted $key sha256sum test* ``` Uses random IV, if no key specified generates random key &...