Hans Olsson

Yes, having it as keyword would be best - because it doesn't fully work to view it as a variable. Fully explanation: See https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaSpecification/pull/3090/files - that implies that each use...

Just to be clear - this is not such a major issue as in most cases records can be avoided by sending individual members of the record to the external...

Poll until end of August, select one (or more) of the emotes as follows: - Thumb down: Don't anything for this. - Rocket - this PR; simpler rules limiting connections...

> Wouldn't it be a good idea to also seek input from the MAP-Lib people on this? Yes in particular people working on fluid-models, @casella can you help with getting...

Just to clarify (from #3129 ) - there are two differences for this rule compared to cardinality-tests: 1. It is based on connection sets, not connection, so the top two...

We selected the other option.

To me this looks like a good idea, but I'm a bit hesitant to add it to Modelica 3.5.

Seems like a good idea, postpone? Poll: 3.5: Martin, Stephan Later: Axel, Gerd, Quentin Abstain: Christoff, Filippo, Leo, Henrik, Markus, Hans No strong majority for 3.5; so postpone.

This mixes different issues, and they should first be listed and then untangled: Previously there were in fact two different issues: - The simulation requirement, which #2962 tried to address,...

> > * For `parameter Real R(start=2)` can a tool allow you to change `R` before solving the initialization problem? (Is such a modification allowed for any parameter?) > >...