Hans Olsson

> If that sentence is not correct then it should be stated that it is enough to specify the start on the type, but start values of builtin types should...

Some comments: - I'm currently working on ensuring that current MCPs go through and other issues are resolved, and thus haven't had time to consider new enhancements. In general having...

Making it replaceable allows you to redeclare it as a sub-class record with additional members, and then there's the final vs. redeclare trap as well. I simply don't see that...

The proposal is to extend choicesAllMatching to record-parameters where you select record-_values_; which includes using record-constructors for matching record-classes _and_ record constants. Select one of the matching emojis before start...

> I guess the idea would be to only present record constructors that can be called without arguments, or would it also be expected to search available code for other...

> @HansOlsson don't you think merging this could be considered a nice step in the direction for annotation cleanup decided at the last web meeting? Possibly, but I saw that...

> @HansOlsson, would it help moving this forward if I request reviews from other people? I feel we are making progress on the presentation on so many annotations now, and...

> I see some of the style 3 converted into style 2 by this PR but not all. Is that ok or do we want to find all instances? >...

> I thought about using choices. What I am not sure about is: does it indicate that no other values are allowed? The description of choices only says that each...

> > I see some of the style 3 converted into style 2 by this PR but not all. Is that ok or do we want to find all instances?...