Hans Mackowiak
Hans Mackowiak
probably fixed by this #51476
@xabbuh some more tests to this problem: > While `#[Context]` can be used on Class now, that Context ist just not passed to the Encoder, only to the (de)normalizers etc.,...
general problem i think, AI thinks it has a benefit with attacking, it just doesn't know it should attack with more
> If we remove the param and script it with extra effect either before or after ControlGain it might be cleaner without engine workarounds? technically yes, but it would make...
> Currently `AbilityUtils.resolveSubAbilities` should try and fill the WaitingTrigger from the previous events with the currently available ones > > Would have to test it handles this interaction correctly though...
@tool4ever @Northmoc while touching GainControl Effect, we might look into this issue again for Untap Trigger
@tool4ever what we could do is use LKI objects of the Trigger so it keeps the current Controller
@tool4ever the rules: > 702.154. Enlist > 702.154a Enlist represents a static ability and a triggered ability. Enlist means “As this creature attacks, you may tap up to one untapped...
@tool4ever i meant to built trigger internal like this: or even have the SpellAbility and or Trigger be built at time when the StaticAbility is parsed, so the Trigger is...
> Thanks, I'll try to update it later > > I could open another PR for easier commenting if you want? yeah a new MR for Exert and/or Enlist would...