Eric Shimizu Karbstein

Well, I think we could think on both as the same problem, I have no problem with that

I forgot to mention that emojis are not supported due many problems with that. What I meant for this issue is to support all unicode characters that matches that feature...

For reference: 1. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49733 2. https://doc.rust-lang.org/unstable-book/language-features/box-syntax.html

What I understood was that nothing is clear LOL

On another dive into the comments on those features using the `box` keyword: Looks like `box` as expression will probably never go to stable and probably remain as a unstable...

Maybe because it is allowed any kind of string, for example I could do `mymacro!(1 10)` or some kind of haskell like operator, are all valid in most cases. But...

I can use this method inside of the Atom tree-sitter grammar definition? And how so?

Yeah, true, doing that it does reparse the token tree, but that I would like to happen on `token_tree_pattern` as well on `macro_definition`, that is possible?

> I don't believe the "applying zero offset to null pointer" bug is very serious. Usually, nothing serious happens on these alone. But it can interact poorly with optimizations in...

I'm having the same issue