Giuseppe L'Erario

Thanks @traversaro! :) Agreed! I'll open a PR for increasing the tolerance, but I'll plan to address this issue in a more structured way. P.S. I do not really understand...

> That for sure should work fine. Reading https://adamj.eu/tech/2018/01/08/pytest-randomly-history/ and similar tests, it seems that people do not like it as you perturb the global state, and so you could...

Just for a log, the proposed solution in https://github.com/ami-iit/ADAM/issues/42#issuecomment-1549505862 is implemented in #39.

Thanks @traversaro !

Thanks a lot @traversaro for solving this ! :)

Hi @JonathanKuelz! Thanks for your interest and for opening the issue :) You're right! This feature has been just introduced by @CarlottaSartore in #49. We introduced a new module, `adam.parametric.casadi/pytorch/etcetc`,...

Thanks @stergiosba for opening the issue! @flferretti is right. Yes @traversaro, I agree!

I guess this is solved. Closing!

I guess this is addressed in #77. Closing