Geequlim
Geequlim
Bunnymark compare to GDScript 2019-11-17: data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fe9f/8fe9f3200419de512f9fafbaea1bfa0d6114746c" alt="Bunnymark Result" 2020-01-01 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/badf7/badf7c858d11f98d41503ef0c539e207b6a632a3" alt="image"
@nhydock No such plan in the near feature.
@cupiniki comment this line https://github.com/Geequlim/ECMAScript/blob/706d39af38e313170ffdbed6f94ee65ad9ec0cd2/generate_builtin_api.py#L6
@nhydock Why not using GDNative/ PluginScript ? 1. I'm not sure the gdnative and the plugin script related stuff is stable enough to finish the work. 2. The performance does...
@nhydock I have thought about reducing the allocation by implementing the builtin type in JS. But there is an important problem. Can the performance of the QuickJS vm achieve the...
A new benchmark result after opimize performance (In both binding code and script code) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec524/ec52436b72c75ead87a35279195764c3082aab49" alt="Benchmark result" As the result shows in `V1DrawTexture` we got more bunnies in JavaScript than GDScript.
There is a bug with stack overflow in QuickJS. You can disable stack checking for this.
@vonagam Does the latest version fixed this ?
@vonagam Does alpha12 fixed this ?
@vonagam I can reproduce the issue when compiled in debug mode with llvm. In release mode with llvm or compiled with gcc in both debug and release mode won't happen.