Anna Weine
Anna Weine
That's pretty surprising about the p256 mult. Probably there's some inlining missing there? Or compiler was cleverer in the bignum case :/ On Fri, 25 Mar 2022, 21:28 Marina Polubelova,...
Sure! On Fri, 25 Mar 2022, 21:35 Marina Polubelova, ***@***.***> wrote: > @Frosne you could try to run this test > > on your laptop (yon need to run first...
I think as we replace the multiplication in the previous PR (https://github.com/project-everest/hacl-star/pull/563), we can just accept this PR :)
Hello :) I will try to answer the first question: AEAD is authenticated encryption with associated data. So you have two components - a message that will be encrypted and...
There are some cases when you don't need the AD buffer. It's possible not to use it.
If you don't mind, I will first check that the modification does not break anything in our code :) I should be back with a definitive answer on Monday. In...
as promised, I am back. It seems that everything works, but I would like to take more time to look at it. I will be away as well, until 13th...
I will take a look:) On Tue, 7 Jun 2022, 18:18 Jonathan Protzenko, ***@***.***> wrote: > Ah, my bad! I thought this was a pow2. > > So yeah, need...
Yea, I did put it in the first message. The main motivation of the modifications are to simplify the code by reusing the functionality already implemented for the generic bignum....
I think Marina and Victor have already done that! See here: (https://github.com/project-everest/hacl-star/pull/543) Unfortunately, I don't think that anything else could be replaced..