Forgind
Forgind
@joeloff, can you make sure to re-test: > Does this search work if the package is unlisted and the version is explicitly specified? before merging? I only tested with the...
I can't approve, but I think this looks good to me. Might consider adding a couple tests, though
I seem to remember you made the same comment to me, and after looking around, I found that I could just change `throw new ToolPackageException` into `throw new GracefulException`, and...
> Waiting on .NET team to get back to this PR Last I checked (in April), this was just waiting on approval.
And I just resolved the merge conflict.
The breaking change part was discussed already in [this thread](https://github.com/microsoft/sbom-tool/pull/933#discussion_r2049342923). It sounded like you wanted to avoid the breaking change, but baronfel did try to mitigate as much as possible,...
@tmat, just hit this issue in https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/pull/45419, which is targeting release/9.0.3xx. I don't think this worked.
https://[helixr1107v0xdeko0k025g8.blob.core.windows.net/dotnet-sdk-refs-pull-45419-merge-3ed9793f78ef4bc6b6/dotnet-watch.Tests.dll.1/1/console.dd2344c8.log?helixlogtype=result](https://helixr1107v0xdeko0k025g8.blob.core.windows.net/dotnet-sdk-refs-pull-45419-merge-3ed9793f78ef4bc6b6/dotnet-watch.Tests.dll.1/1/console.dd2344c8.log?helixlogtype=result)
> [@Forgind](https://github.com/Forgind) You can ignore Mac ARM64 failures. The machines are slow and the tests time out. Can you explain that a bit further? @marcpopMSFT told me that those machines...