Friedrich von Never

@rstm-sf, will it fix the 0.9 migration issue?

Thanks to @rstm-sf, we were able to fix the migration issue, and now AvaloniaMath is looking good, again. The last step would be to fix the code duplication in the...

@B3zaleel, thank you, this is very cool. How did you generate this `.wmpkg` file? It includes very interesting XML files I'd like to know about.

Unfortunately, my knowledge of UWP specifics is very limited. I guess it has no access to WPF graphic primitives? So, it has to be a new backend (like an Avalonia...

Please also fix these TODOs: - [x] https://github.com/ForNeVeR/wpf-math/blob/c8c6a5f4efc88ddbc0f6807693c7f09906470e20/src/WpfMath/Atoms/RowAtom.cs#L76 - [ ] https://github.com/ForNeVeR/wpf-math/blob/c8c6a5f4efc88ddbc0f6807693c7f09906470e20/src/WpfMath/Atoms/RowAtom.cs#L62

Thanks for your help! > I haven't yet read through everything and mostly followed the warnings to fix nullability issues. Yep, that's what I had in mind when writing this...

Also, please note that I'd also accept a partial migration (i.e. covering only some files in the project) if it's impossible/too tedious to migrate the whole project at once. One...

> One thing I noticed is that with TargetFramework=net452 the analyzer seems less smart and ignores things like `Debug.Assert` and other things. This made a few `!` necessary. This is...

That's alright; please do whatever unblocks the future work. We'll figure out how to proceed with the legacy framework later.

I've decided to keep this issue open even after merging #277. Remaining small pieces of work are enumerated in the opening post.