Friedrich von Never

Also, which package provides that? I wasn't able to make [latexbase](https://latexbase.com/) to render it:

It looks like `\enclose` is exclusively provided by MathJax, and has nothing to do with the real LaTeX (see also [this](https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/522397/109147)). I am not against implementing a subset of MathJax...

A possible test case (in C# for explanation's sake, so we'll of course need to convert to C): ```csharp sbyte[] x = new[] { -1 }; sbyte y = x[0];...

@kant2002, please take a look at this… essay. It is related to how we currently handle #360. Do you see any other cases requiring special handling? What do you think...

@Fantoom, this also somewhat touches the topic of #345, and I remember you were interested in that one some time ago.

(sorry, force-pushed to fix a silly typo)

Partially resolved by #170: we've added more conversion features, but it seems there's still no check?

Finally, the runners are available on GitHub: https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/8439 Perhaps we can do something about this.

Ugh.

While the main concern here is compilation, there's also a secondary concern of testing. And it's impossible to test M1 binaries without M1 agent.