Daniel S Poulin
Daniel S Poulin
@little-dude I'd love to help out with implementing some of this. I've started playing around with the codebase, but let me know if you'd like to coordinate efforts.
Does this work with buffer-close-all and the like as well? Seems like it might.
Tested this out with various combinations of all of the buffer close options, cquit, etc, and with one and two buffers, and everything seems to work swimingly! Code looks good...
@pascalkuthe thanks for putting in the work to identify a reasonable policy! These kinds of efforts often go unappreciated, but are very important.
Could we have a description or even better screenshots of what this does? Is there a related issue to link?
I quite like this. Can't help but think this would be an uncontroversial default.
Played with this just now. I feel like it works particularly well without spaces/tabs being rendered, but feels a little empty with them present. So I can see and agree...
I think the sense of this is backwards compared to other verbiage in the editor. `:vsplit` results in a side-by-side split, whereas here "horizontal" is the side-by-side version. I got...
IMO this is almost ready for merge, but there's one remaining nitpick. As it stands, this PR changes the default picker layout direction from how it currently renders. I think...