Ditch Townsend

See #124 for an explanation of why I am not following this up, but I will leave this issue open in case someone else wants to.

Really pleased to see all your interest @h-mayorquin . I want there to be a significant rewrite of definitions, a rethink of relations, reliance on sourcing, and the addition of...

See #124 for an explanation of why I am not following this up, but I will leave this issue open in case someone else wants to.

@matentzn was this achieved?

GO may be deprecating or obsoleting a number of behavioural terms in the future. This issue may have turned itself inside out: 1. There may be a number of classes...

This seems to be linked to the question of what to do with the phenotype term 'asleep' #131

1. @matentzn has argued that being 'asleep' NBO:0000649 (Phenotype branch) [is a phenotype](https://github.com/obo-behavior/behavior-ontology/discussions/133#discussioncomment-5023155). 2. GO:0042746 implicitly defines wakefulness as the opposite of asleep. Wikipedia says so explicitly, and no longer...

> However, there are specific behavioral attributes of "Sleeping" that, I argue, mean that we need to keep that term as a behavior Absolutely @aclark-binghamton-edu - I am NOT suggesting...

An online behaviour ontologies coordination meeting is taking place on 6th July 2023 at 18:00 UK time. Attached is my contribution on behalf of the NBO as I am unlikely...

A video of most of the meeting can be found [here](https://uzh-my.sharepoint.com/:v:/g/personal/janna_hastings_uzh_ch/EVMIfIvFj_xBqHF9-LycZp4BrWt5ImFHLZx_JAY3-FtF3w?e=wOyMTK).