Juho Teperi

- What's the extension point, Coercion protocol maybe? Or is there something else that should be able to extend this? - Coercion is itself set in the route-data, so we...

Maybe a simple solution: `router` level options to control route-data merging, provide a function in Malli namespace that can be used for this option. This would need to be set...

Coercion value is itself set in the route data, it is hard to get the used coercion before we have merged the route data. Also, what if the top-level uses...

I have a version where Coercion implementations now implement RouteDataMerge protocol which is used to collect route-data parts into one map. The problems: - Route data merge is currently tied...

Just use normal Clojure destructuring with Reagent components, and leave `r/children` for interop. `(defn my-component [props & children] ...)`

Yes, though if you can choose, I'd force passing in the props map always, similar to React.

I'd like to add self-host test case at some point to the project. Those interop macros will probably be removed at some point which hopefully will help with this: #325.

What's the status of self-hosted cljs? Both Lumo and Planck seem a bit old and haven't been updated to the latest clojurescript versions?

Well, I do like beer. I'll attend at least [ClojuTRE](http://clojutre.org/2017/) and perhaps EuroClojure and ClojureX this year. So your welcome to ping me if you happen to attend these ;)...

This is a bug, I've forgotten to implement the function-components case for `reactify-component`. It should be possible to implement this using the existing API.