Davis Vaughan

I'm fairly certain the problem is less about reading comments than it is about writing them back after we make modifications. Even the jsonlite library allows reading comments https://github.com/jeroen/jsonlite/blob/4ba1a17db67ae47c0fdd3c5728e254f6d38502b3/src/yajl/api/yajl_parse.h#L123 As...

@lionel- and I learned that the VS Code Settings UI uses a standalone parser node-jsonc-parser which actually does retain comments (notably their Extension API drops comments, which is annoying, different...

First step would be building Ark for Windows ARM and publishing that `ark.exe` binary in our Ark releases IIUC the way this works is that GitHub Actions runners are provided...

We will be looking at this soon to get a patch release of cpp11 out. It seems that the R-devel non-API tweaks have slowed down to the point that we...

Isn't that extremely old? Like, "last release in 2015 and no longer supported" old? https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/

This will fix the panic https://github.com/posit-dev/air/pull/240, also `air format . --log-level=trace` will print extra information about the process, and with https://github.com/posit-dev/air/pull/239 you'd have actually been able to see the name...

I believe we are going to require some kind of update from cargo-dist to keep CI running due to this. First, note that GitHub extended the Ubuntu 20.04 deadline from...

Okay so if you're just trying to "get by" and not fail on CI come April 15th, you can apply the changes in this PR to your own repos to...

You're building for musl here: https://github.com/Cyfrin/safe-hash-rs/blob/4dedd48e5c922ff2990e0a02c90358981e2f7197/dist-workspace.toml#L13 i.e. the `"x86_64-unknown-linux-musl"` there, so you probably need something like this ```toml [dist.github-custom-runners.x86_64-unknown-linux-musl] runner = "ubuntu-latest" container = { image = "quay.io/pypa/manylinux_2_28_x86_64", host =...

My comment gets lost from GitHub collapsing intermediate comments, but this is still the right way to fix this: https://github.com/axodotdev/cargo-dist/issues/1760#issuecomment-2769218034