Dan Gould

@erskingardner thanks for the quick turnaround. note that the original test_vectors.json are reproducible from the [go-hpke repository](https://github.com/cisco/go-hpke) which is why I originally committed it as a separate file. No problem...

Converted to draft until we have some more experience with the implementations in the wild. Still seeking review especially on the soundness of the network privacy, choice of cryptosystem, and...

@jonatack Thank you for the review and implicit advice about how to clarify technical specifications such as this one with even small changes like using explicit subjects. Your patient, thorough...

> Hi @DanGould, want to update here? Since the last review I have made breaking changes, which I'll apply with an update now. I think we're at the point where...

The main changes from the last review are that - HTTP request methods (POST, GET, PUT) control the flow of the protocol rather than further path subdiretories - bip21 parameters...

@nothingmuch I'll write up your suggestions to simplify the protocol. It makes the directory implementation simpler, requires fewer protocol message types, and even reduces bandwidth. wowza > The sender could...

@nothingmuch and I have been revising behind the scenes over the past 2 weeks. Have not forgotten. Update coming soon

A major rewrite touched every section of the document and reorganized the hierarchy. This is ready for review. - abstract introduces what and why - motivation touches on the privacy...

@murchandamus I've addressed your comments except for some of those to which I left replies.

Thanks for the thorough review I'd missed some comments and so addressed those as well as the new ones