Consti10
Consti10
So right now my goal is to make the server / provider exactly adhere to all functionalities of the mavlink protocoll (as already said earlier, the get_by_index instead of get_by_string_id...
So after running around in circles multiple times, I think the issue with the param_count/param_index for extended vs non-extended is actually not really solvable with how the current public api...
As you might have noticed from the commits, I am getting to a point where the Server / parameter_receiver is almost ready and kept the following feature: 1) Talking to...
Here is a quick list of the changes that need to be done to the public api (so to say): 1) For the server: None other than what I already...
2 more simple questions: 1) How do I create a simple unit test for the mavlink core libary (I want to test mavlink_paramater_xxx directly without going through the public api...
> 2 more simple questions: > > 1. How do I create a simple unit test for the mavlink core libary (I want to test mavlink_paramater_xxx directly without going through...
> There are quite a few changes here by now which makes it hard to review... > > I think it would be good if we can get CI passing...
> @Consti10 thanks. I will have to think about what you wrote. I hope we can find away to enable your use case. Thanks, that's nice to hear. I think...
Dummy for code: https://github.com/OpenHD/XOpenHDVideo
Question: What happens if the decoding fails ( e.g. the decoder crashes usw): The module needs to handle this case without any problems. Since the video stream over the air...