Vladimir Smirnov

Do we need any extra work in this place? Or we should close this and improve handling of the cases mentioned in #175?

Currently you can use go-carbon with graphite-web for tagged metrics. It's not possible to use it with carbonzipper/carbonapi as of now. The problem with the progress on that is that...

I'll have a look at that monday or so.

Can you please check (and post trace) if you can reproduce that with master branch? https://github.com/lomik/go-carbon/commit/c539e3466bf3124b56ce548aeb7bd5509b25cffa - this commit changed the logic quite a bit and honestly I can't reproduce...

In case of panic carbonserver should actually stop working, that's saner than trying to run despite of that. And again if the panic happens there, then the bug is somewhere...

@maggnus the same questions: 1. Is it still happening with go-carbon from master branch? 2. If it happens - what's the error message and a stack trace for the panic?...

@maggnus still seems to be first of all - separate issue, and secondly - that's still not enough info. What kind of HW/VM do you have? What's the amount of...

Read load likely caused by carbonserver. By default trigram-index is enabled and to construct it it scan filesystem once in a while. Also trigram index is in-memory but it will...

To be precise you can use: 1. graphite-web on top (on the same server for example) and connect graphite-web via carbonlink to go-carbon (that would have a tags support) 2....

Key might be what diffenrece between replies from go-carbon and VM for both `node1.node2.node3.*.node4.node5.*.node6.node7.node8.node9.node10.p95` and `timeShift(node1.node2.node3.*.node4.node5.*.node6.node7.node8.node9.node10.p95, '1h')` (names would matter)