Arbitrary.Logic
Arbitrary.Logic
@DRSDavidSoft, go for it. This repo is here for the community.
Sorry, been a while since I visited this repo. I can certainly add this for you. I'll sort it when I'm home from work today.
No worries, glad it could be of service.
I can look at changing it. I just wanted to move away from the MIT licence. There are some major bug fixes already in the code since the licence change,,...
> Please change to LGPL if you want people to use it. That is what I'm saying I can do. I will finish some more updates for it and I'll...
I'll implement it as `%r` maybe. Although the EEPROM will need a new specifier. It'll be a breaking change, so I'll have to do a big check to see if...
I've also overlooked the `%p` specifier, I might as well implement that too. This will force the repeat, and PROGMEM specifiers to change.
I have been using this as my guide to what the correct options are: http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/cstdio/printf/
I think it'd be simplest to stick with the C standard library. The link I posted is seems to be the ones required for a standard C implementation. This will...
I have a proposal for this ready in the branch '[printf_specifiers](https://github.com/Chris--A/PrintEx/tree/printf_specifiers)'. Adding the new features only adds on 86 bytes. All new features work: ``` C++ signed int count, total;...