CPerezz
CPerezz
FYI; Spec document being worked on in: https://hackmd.io/3v8dBSfuQiGlGLAx2RQe9w?view will have a close relation with this. We might want to extend it and do all at once :)
I like the idea. I would wait until @joebebel 's PR gets merged to then impl it on the cleanest way possible.
I think we could remove the 3rd and 4th iteration labels since we will need to see common and shared data structures between different polynomial commitment schemes to generate an...
Hey @simonmasson how's this going?
The idea was that internally we sometimes need to convert scalars between curves. And for that, we need to know that we can indeed transform an outer curve scalar into...
Is this still valid and/or finnished? @vlopes11
We could split it using a workspace but keep it in this same repo maybe.
Makes complete sense! Feel free to leave this here until it is useful to merge it!
> im not completely sure if changing the config layout like this is a breaking change or not. I think so. Basically when you're now setting `None` for these config...
So the macro stuff has been already addressed. And tested. I'm just concerned about one thing regarding the `SpotifyConfig` struct. Should the `alsa_backend`-only fields be `Option` or just T? Since...