Boostrix
Boostrix
The general point is valid, we need to provide strategies to deal with options and evaluate those, which is something that I have recently begun experimenting with - basically any...
Not sure what exactly you had in mind, so I've tried to incorporate some of the ideas we've seen over the last couple of days, see: #4133
> In this challenge we need to figure out a prompt that's very specific, then make it read a certain file that should lead to the agent updating its goals....
FWIW, this looks potentially useful and is better than the current situation. So it would be great to see this reviewed/integrated. That being said, with all the talk about sub-agents...
We may still want to expose this stuff at runtime, it's one of the most recurring issues that people are running into: https://discord.com/channels/1092243196446249134/1092423060923101304/1115963736642035732
As long as it's strictly config only, or introducing new options, should be pretty safe to consider even prior to the /during the re-arch
> That it VERY interesting indeed. I've been playing about with getting Auto-GPT to improve itself and write it's own code, this might just be the ticket! I guess, a...
related to #2158
This solved the issue for me: - https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT/pull/4016
I've tried to use a separate interpretation step to interpret the result of an action and modify the plan accordingly, that worked at least somewhat better than it did before....