Boostrix
Boostrix
definitely useful AND dangerous, probably should be strictly opt-in via a corresponding env option, and should only be made available automatically when inside a docker container. Other than that, that...
this tends to happen a lot when using sub-agents, which is kinda pointless: #3673
if possible, please update/fix the PR as requested, so that it can be considered for the upcoming release. Thanks!
See also #1359
> To summarize our thoughts: tests that involve prompting the AI should either be usable as a benchmark to test the AI's efficacy, or as a smoke test that needs...
> tests that involve prompting the AI should either be usable as a benchmark to test the AI's efficacy, or as a smoke test that needs max 3 cycles to...
> I feel like access to python instance of Agent could suffice. At first stage. right now, it's just a set of standalone files to illustrate the idea of running...
Didn't seem to get much traction / feedback at the time - like many other PRs 🙃
As mentioned elsewhere, I would also suggest to introduce version fields for these config files, so that these can be easily migrated if/when the need arises, including changes breaking backward...
it also seems there are currently some other env/yaml related PRs in process - maybe you could reach out to those folks so that these could integrate their changes with...