Boostrix
Boostrix
> another funny STUCK! we all know for some softwares, you need to input `y` to check agreements, that will stuck Auto-GPT too!!! right, there is the hard-coded requirement (constraint)...
there already is the constraint to only use non-interactive apps, so this isn't always working well - maybe it would make sense to validate shell commands before they're executed, and...
Related: ##3680
Sorry if this sounds a little weird, but maybe it's worth trying: would the folks with open redis PRs consider mutually reviewing their PRs to gather some feedback from people...
> We could use this https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT/issues/3901 as the bar raiser, since it doesn't look easy to achieve. FWIW, I believe we can work out a way to run an outer...
this should probably be renamed to something like "multi modality" ?
if this is committed "as is", it would make sense for auto-gpt to run inside a separate environment - i.e. using chroot or ideally using a dedicated "autogpt" user. That...
I did copy that advice into the source tree and opened a corresponding PR: - #3961
there are already some hard-coded heuristics to detect if agpt is running inside docker - I suppose the "separate user" idea could be implemented via a corresponding env file setting,...
sure, they won't accept multiple features in a single PR anyway Also see: - https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT/issues/4045