benim
benim
> u have any questions or need further clarification on any of the changes. Hi @crestdatasystems, The demo looks great, nice work. Regarding the incident type issue, can we schedule...
Approved from my end
Hi @nitsan-tzur, is this PR ready for review or still a draft?
> Hi @Benimanela @merit-maita , we have set "unsearchable: true" for fields wherever needed as per your last comment's recommendation. Please review the pr again and let us know how...
> Hi @Kchekh, Thank you for the work on this contribution. The implementation looks good overall. > > I have a few comments from a security perspective at this stage:...
Hi @konraduh, It looks like the `type` field is missing in `classifier-Argus_Case_5_9_9.json`. Please add `"type": "classification"` and rerun the CI. Thanks!
Hi @matt6697, Thank you for your contribution! Please add release notes and update the version in the pack-metatad.json file.