Kyle J Strand
Kyle J Strand
@ehuss should this issue be closed, then?
@ehuss 🤦🏻 Sorry, I forgot that just because it's implemented doesn't mean it's stabilized.
@Fishrock123 The checkbox list in the comment at the top of this thread are "unresolved issues", meaning design questions that needed to be answered. It is not a complete list...
...I agree this is a bit confusing, though. Several of those do look like implementation requirements, and are linked to merged PRs.
Will this be in the beta on October 5th and available in the stable channel on November 16th?
I've always found it strange that completions for git never seem to include `ls-files`, at least the name of the command itself. It seems to me that of the low-level...
Just upgraded my installation; this seems to work! Thanks!
Sorry for the delay; I think I've addressed all comments.
@tmandry @nikomatsakis I'm not sure you saw my comments & changes last week, but I think this is ready for re-review.
@nbdd0121 Can that be done on merge? I've heard that GitHub sometimes has trouble with PR branches that receive force-pushes.