Olivier Mélois
Olivier Mélois
If it makes your life easier and as long as there remains an expecty-only jar, I'm not opposed to it
I seem to be having a similar issue, when the AWS IAM role available to drone does not let him create a bucket : The logs indicate that ### Logs...
@djspiewak, here's a repro that eliminates other libraries from the equation. I think it has to do with how `Resource` behaves conjointly with Dispatcher. ```scala //> using lib "org.typelevel::cats-effect-cps:0.3.0" //>...
@djx314 the mechanisms on top of which this library is implemented differ massively from Scala 2 to Scala 3. In Scala 3, the async/await block desugars (roughly) to a bunch...
> However, more generally, I think this does illustrate the peril of the Scala 2 version of this library I do agree that, though I'm sure Jason Zaugg had a...
Hello ! @djspiewak will be able to put it more eloquently than I can, but having some magic `awaitResource` syntax that `unlifts` Resource into IO is probably not a great...
> And you're forced to work at the level of Resource instead of IO Working (or being forced to work) at the level of resource whenever any kind of lifecycle...
> This looks really nice! I think we're going to need a Scala 3 version though before it can be merged, but otherwise I'm in favor! I've started doing it...
That's interesting. So would `bleep setup-ide --variant myVariant` work ? Would you approve the possibility of a "default" variant that'd be automatically applied when setting up the ide. I'm thinking...