Martin Adámek
Martin Adámek
also please update the PR description to reflect current state
I think you are too concerned with edge cases nobody even reported, I wouldn't bother with custom types that can remap null to a value now. What else is this...
> propWithHiddenUnion: (string | null) & Hidden; I wouldn't bother with that. > propWithHiddenUnion: (string & Hidden) | null; And if this doesn't work for the `Hidden` type, that is...
Interesting idea, I am all in for any kind of type-level improvements.
Closing as duplicate of #5807. > It is an issue of having identically named properties (each property having a different type: here different enums, but could be one is "int"...
Oh, you have different field names there, I missed that part. I recall we had an issue for that somewhere too, this boils down to how things are internally designed,...
It's enough to add a parameter to that method, having something like `manyToManyName` sounds weird if we wouldn't have the other relation kind methods too.
Hmm, ok, then I am not really sold on this being a good first issue :D The code in the entity generator is getting really complex, and it is indeed...
Makes sense to me, thoughts @boenrobot?
Right now I would be more in favor of a QB support for this, which would be the first step anyway if we want to have something like `em.clone`. What...