Christophe Duquesne
Christophe Duquesne
Postpone (not for 2.0)
Thanks @ue71603 ... it's a very goo starting point. We need to make a few updates for a better NeTEx integration, I will work on it ASAP (jumping from meeting...
@nick-knowles - @ue71603 - @Aurige to Update the proposal, including Transmodel update (maybe for next TM revision)
I agree that going to the details of the DECK PLAN level is quite a lot of work, and will lead to a lack of a global overview of the...
Part 2 Document has been updated A UML (physical model) update may be needed ... but is not fully mandatory at document level
Huge list Most are _xxx_RelStructure_ ... This is part of the NeTEx XSD design rules, as explained in Part 1 "_One-to-many relationships are implemented with an explicit data structure for...
That's just the working process, when you create an new object you also create all the service stuff, it(s a kind of template. A bit like when you crate a...
It's in Part 1 document (as mentioned above) but can be complemented if needed ... but that's another topic I will add this removal of unused types as a discussion...
Transmode Modes should be reworked soon due the request of the addition of New Modes (vehicle pooling, vehicle sharing, etc.) from the Commision. The design has already be done in...
Yes, that's an action for the revision