Valentino Giudice

@eltonmesquita Regardless of whether you will use the Hippocratic License or not for future releases, it appears to me that you are ignoring the rights of contributors who contributed under...

(I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice). The general assumptions for contributions on GitHub and similar platforms is that the copyright holder of the contributions (i.e....

> the best solution would be to adopt a double license (MIT and Hippocratic) I don't understand what you mean by "adopt[ing] a double license". You only chose the license...

> Yes, but code that was contributed while the project was MIT-licensed can't be re-released under any other license without asking each contributor specifically. Exactly, that's what I wrote too....

The RedPajama project by Together and several other organizations is supposed to have, according to their [article](https://www.together.xyz/blog/redpajama), 3 components: 1) Pretraining data 2) Base models 3) Instruction tuning data and...

I'm confused. Does the word "address" here refer to NIP-19 `nevent` identifiers? If so, I would personally object to having them as part of the protocol in the `q` tag,...

Ah, ok, thank you.

I second the request for the most precise version of Grok xAI has. Indeed, I think the unquatized version is what most clearly qualifies as "source code" (as it may...