Valentino Giudice
Valentino Giudice
I know this is old, but it is needed.
(I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice). The first thing to say is that this license is about as far away from open source as it...
(**I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice**) > Also, the Unlicense is INVALID in some countries such as Germany, and has unclear meaning in some other...
@karam72 if you are the copyright holder of a project (you automatically are if you are the author) then there are certain things only you can do, and are illegal...
I do not think it is necessary and it would suggest a bias in favour of OSI approval (over, for instance, FSF approval). If it is added, I think a...
I'd like to point out this license, while considered free, only mentions "use of the work". Licenses with more detailed language are to be preferred.
(**I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice**). I don't consider it nonfree. I am just pointing out other licenses are a bit more clear about what...
I was just looking at issues on this repo.
> I don't really understand the difference. The difference between what? Anyways, my comments are a bit off topic. But not completely. I don't oppose to adding the Fair License...
I do not know if it'd be good to correct it until they do: maybe it's best to leave this issue open until then. But "CC 4.0" does not mean...