Henrik Tjäder

In addition to what @TobTobXX suggested, which also was part of how I had nvim setup, I propose that also changing to a different split or buffer might be a...

Exciting with RISC-V activities! :) As you might have noted, in export.rs there's this function: ``` #[inline] #[must_use] pub fn logical2hw(logical: u8, nvic_prio_bits: u8) -> u8 { ((1

Now I see your point, good catch! ``` error: this literal must be in the range 1...255 --> ui/task-priority-too-high.rs:46:37 | 46 | #[task(binds = I2C1, priority = 256)] | ^^^...

Now with the awesome work in #733 merged, how should we go about this? Breaking change if we remove it altogether, but it would be cleaner :+1:

Thank you for reporting! I forgot to make a note here during the meeting Discussed during meeting: [hackmd](https://hackmd.io/c_mFUZL-Q2C6614MlrrxOg#Agenda-2024-02-21) Matrix: [message](https://matrix.to/#/!yafYEipFNsXDdwiHMT:matrix.org/$Xy01bvh7cURmq6D26RgYOzKe6ckEWDP7KsngOLS2DLw?via=matrix.org&via=mozilla.org&via=nitro.chat)

Did you figure this out by using the Arbiter?

@Finomnis Could you please rebase on latest master branch and while doing that remove all merge commits? Might also be a good opportunity to tidy a bit in the commit...

@Finomnis don't worry about the esp32c3 QEMU run :) I'm in the process of squashing/tidying the PR which is about to be merged But if you got more commits coming...

I took the liberty of tacking on a tiny CI fix, to get CI happy enough for a merge :)

Blocked by https://github.com/probe-rs/rtt-target/issues/33