AZero13

Results 191 comments of AZero13

pathsec: make check for PATHSPEC_LITERAL more readable

Ok

pathsec: make check for PATHSPEC_LITERAL more readable

Ok

[InstCombine] Fold mul (lshr exact (X, N)), 2^N + 1 -> add (X , lshr exact (X, N))

Okay so if the IR just repeats I guess I can remove one use but what if there's frozen involved @goldsteinn Then it should be one use no?

[InstCombine] Fold mul (lshr exact (X, N)), 2^N + 1 -> add (X , lshr exact (X, N))

> > Okay so if the IR just repeats I guess I can remove one use but what if there's frozen involved @goldsteinn > > > > > > Then...

[InstCombine] Fold mul (lshr exact (X, N)), 2^N + 1 -> add (X , lshr exact (X, N))

> > > > Okay so if the IR just repeats I guess I can remove one use but what if there's frozen involved @goldsteinn > > > > >...

[InstCombine] Fold mul (lshr exact (X, N)), 2^N + 1 -> add (X , lshr exact (X, N))

> > > > Okay so if the IR just repeats I guess I can remove one use but what if there's frozen involved @goldsteinn > > > > >...

[InstCombine] Fold mul (lshr exact (X, N)), 2^N + 1 -> add (X , lshr exact (X, N))

@nikic Can we please merge this?

[InstCombine] Fold mul (lshr exact (X, N)), 2^N + 1 -> add (X , lshr exact (X, N))

@dtcxzyw I do not have merge permissions.

[InstCombine] Fold mul (lshr exact (X, N)), 2^N + 1 -> add (X , lshr exact (X, N))

> The code doesn't match the proofs (the proofs have freeze instructions, the code does not). Fixed!

[bmalloc] Use len instead of calling strlen again

> This is not improving the things as they are not used twice. Yes they are?