Alexander J. Pfleger
Alexander J. Pfleger
@andiwand suggested in the dev-meeting: - physmon is fine again, maybe just clash with different PR - 1 hash changed, maybe because one of the masses changed. We should go...
@paulgessinger: The plugin is quite old and was used by @FabianKlimpel in 2018 for testing. Maybe there was an EDM mismatch, that Fabian tried to work around. It seems like...
@junggjo9 @paulgessinger @asalzburger @andiwand In the tests, it makes a difference of around 1% (not sure if this is significant). How should we proceed with this?
@andiwand @timadye what is the status on this?
## GX2F adds like the KF `externalSurfaces`. This came with - https://github.com/acts-project/acts/pull/3100 I didn't check, if all of them are used all the time, but looking at the histograms in...
Maybe my debugging hints, I shared with @toyamaza might be useful. (He also showed some interest in this topic.) For checking, I added in the GX2F at the beginning and...
@asalzburger did you encounter this problem? @DraTeots is this still an issue, with the current version?
dev-meeting: @andiwand: this is probably fixed. If time estimation was too stiff, we ould not find a track in the region.
as discussed in the dev-meeting: let's include @benjaminhuth into the discussion and decide on how to continue with this PR :)
# Description Some of the diagonal elements of the parameter covariance happen to be negative sometimes. ``` // track parameters error // MARK: fpeMaskBegin(FLTINV, 1, #2348) m_err_eLOC0[ipar].push_back( std::sqrt(covariance(Acts::eBoundLoc0, Acts::eBoundLoc0))); m_err_eLOC1[ipar].push_back(...