Ambrogio Foletti

@procrastinatio maybe bound to [this](https://github.com/geoadmin/mf-chsdi3/commit/d14558764625cc444b05cb3734f8362671e27788)?

> Ouch, I am sorry to hear that! > > @davidoesch could you be so kind to check [this issue](https://github.com/geoadmin/mf-chsdi3/issues/3433)? I've just discovered that my client application broke because you...

+100

I still think it could be good to be able to filter at the model level. I have to admit that I fail at recognizing the degree of complexity of...

We are currently integrating a new version of the WASTA layer from BFE. This is the only layer today, but in preparation there are 4 to 8 layers from geology...

In my opinion it does make sense to support it. Having only "instant" objects as time-enabled until now is more or less the result of chance. This is changing, and...

Thanks for your answer Cédric. Globally, I find your idea of showing the history in an extended tooltip really interesting and I'll try to convince BFE to accept it. Still,...

Final decision on the WASTA layer is a nogo, so on my side discussion is over, at least for this layer. Since a more global discussion is needed, I let...

Just to make you aware of that: the client (BFE) is still waiting for this issue to be addressed and regularly asks about that. What do we want to do?...

Everything clear, but a single issue With 4) I mean that the user has no easy way to explore our 650+ datasets. Either he searches for something (but he has...