Fake result in Identify Features in layer ch.bfe.solarenergie-eignung-daecher breaks client applications

[RobertoMinelli]

While performing an Identify Features request on the ch.bfe.solarenergie-eignung-daecher layer, I discovered that among the results now you have a fake result with "featureId": -99

You use this message when an user opens the visualizer without a selection:

However, this breaks all the client applications relying on the fact that all results of an Identify Features will have the same shape (i.e., attributes, for example). Could you please comment on that?

Best, Roberto

Here you can find a sample request. The fake result is the last one.

[davidoesch]

@boecklic related to today’s deploy? @RobertoMinelli since when is this the case?

[RobertoMinelli]

I have been on hold with my client project for a while — I discovered it yesterday. Debug it today. And here I am.

Thanks for looking into it. IMHO this shouldn't be there, it's highly inconsistent.

[davidoesch]

@mariokeusen - can you check if this is GIGO with BFE as well?

[AFoletti]

This result is nothing new and has always been the case. If you look at the model for both Daecher and Fassaden solarkataster, the results are differenciated by scale. On smaller scales (minscale = 100005) you get the overview result, not the actual roof geometries.

[AFoletti]

Hmmmm... on a closer look, something is really fishy out there. I need to spend some time on it

[AFoletti]

Ok, found it.

Somehow Roberto's mapExtent=0,0,100,100 messes up with chsdi's delicate internal organs and he gets results from both models. If you take Roberto's original request (see the opening comment) and modify mapExtent to mapExtent=1,1,100,100 you only get roof results. test

I cannot rule out that something has effectively changed in this respect (was mapExtent=0,0,100,100 correctly handled before? No idea) but to me the model and the layer work as defined.

Maybe @procrastinatio could tell us something about this behavior?

[RobertoMinelli]

Dear @AFoletti, thanks for looking into the issue.

My code is unchanged in the last months, hence yes, something has changed in your API. I confirm that mapExtent=0,0,100,100 was working before (i.e., all my requests have that mapExtent, since I... never understood what to do with that parameter but it was required).

With mapExtent=1,1,100,100 it seems to be working again. Now I have a failing test when I play with the ch.bfe.solarenergie-eignung-fassaden layer. Apparently I receive a facade with two equal points. I'll look into that.

Best, Roberto

[AFoletti]

@procrastinatio maybe bound to this?