Tom Akehurst

@raphw I'll try to look at this the w/c 12th of December (I'm maxed out with the day job up until then)

@reta thank you for contributing this!

Yep, this is now obsolete.

Hard to say because there isn't a pure-Java Brotli implementation out there at the moment. We are working on improving the way response bodies are stored, so you can at...

I haven't had a chance to look at this yet, and probably won't for a while. My intention (loosely) was to wait until I was ready to work on v3,...

Thank you for reporting this. I'll investigate.

Since they're async WRT to each other, there's no way WireMock (or any other service) could guarantee the state change triggered by one would always be seen by another, short...

Hey, sorry for taking so long to review this. I think this is an improvement over having to live with shared/static state, I still have a "there be dragons" feeling...

I'm not really keen on this idea I'm afraid, as it means a) (as you say) there'd be two ways to add extensions, b) it wouldn't be possible to inject...

I've refactored and mostly solved the client issue here, if you want to try pulling this: https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock/tree/tom-custom-content-pattern I still can't get the custom registration of `ContentPattern` subtypes to work at...