Tom Akehurst
Tom Akehurst
I think this is looking pretty good, although I wanted to do a bit of profiling on it before merging as it still seems to be a bit slower than...
Reproduced, caused by the fact the matching code uses the same JSON parsing/serialising configuration as WireMock itself, which treats null values as equivalent to absent fields.
A possible solution to this would be to introduce an alternative parsing configuration for user data doesn't have this flag set.
I've labelled this as an enhancement rather than bug, but I agree it'd be nice to be able to test this case specifically. Do you feel like investigating whether Jetty...
Please could you share full details of how to replicate this issue?
I've been thinking for a while that something like this would be a great idea. Happy to accept a PR for it. I'd suggest adding `thenReturn` to `MappingBuilder`. Something like...
I wouldn't recommend attempting that right now. There are some changes coming to the way WireMock manages its state and the approach taken in that PR won't be compatible with...
I'm thinking it'd be a good idea to fix this in the next major version rather than now. I've looked at this issue a couple of times in the last...
Please could you post a test case to reproduce this?
Whatever code you're running that causes the failure, please make the test case as similar as possible.