Tobie Langel

>>I've had to request access to the thing about horizontal review you linked to BTW. > >Tracking here: #9 OK, so that's been solved for the minutes of every meeting...

I'm folding issue #8 into this one, as we've agreed during our 2019-01-29 call that both had similar enough process requirements to do so. #8 is a request coming [from...

A good first step here would be to figure out what is already being done in terms of horizontal reviews. What process have been set up, if any? What WG...

@sumodas: would love to assign you too 😈, but I can't until you accept to join the ampproject organization.

(Sorry for re-assigning you, @levidurfee. I wanted to add @sumodas, but he's not a member of the org yet. So there must be some weird UI-issue where that reset the...

We [discussed this issue on our last call](https://github.com/ampproject/meta-ac/blob/master/meetings/2019-03-05.md#horizontal-reviews-5), but don't have a lot of notes for it. I think what we'd want to end-up with here, is state-of-the-art solution for...

@sumodas can you join us by VC during the London F2F to discuss this? If so, could you please add this topic to one (or two?) agenda slots in https://github.com/ampproject/meta-ac/issues/22?...

Some updates to this issue in the [London F2F minutes](https://github.com/ampproject/meta-ac/blob/master/meetings/2019-03-f2f.md#accessibility) on the accessibility front in particular: - [x] reach out to TSC/Accessibility WG and ask for audit of existing components....

Additional updates from the [London F2F](https://github.com/ampproject/meta-ac/blob/master/meetings/2019-03-f2f.md#organise-verticals-in-groups) on the verticals groups: * Vertical groups could be AC, while horizontal review is clearly TSC. * Goal is to be more inclusive *...

Worth noting the work happening around process for intent to implement (I2I), too. See notably: - https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/pull/24072 - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bF5tHbm-ObyjKLfoiIEAI5V-YvMsA3Bchsux5u4cKZM/edit