Tobie Langel

> Here is also a more fundamental question: Given there is no GOVERNANCE.md, I feel some of this process was drafted for this document. Is this process what you are...

Hi everybody, Thanks for your interest in this task force. I'm suggesting we do kickoff meeting next week at our regular meeting time on Monday. I will send a calendar...

> Some interesting data: https://twitter.com/aleyda/status/1396021867434160128 Indeed. To tie this back to our conversation yesterday, this data would be much more actionable if it was segmented. For those for whom the...

# Summary of the TF's first two meetings: We had two meetings so far. We used a round table format for the first meeting to gather participants' input rather informally....

The draft report is available [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xZke2SxvXMg3skFIzcKJN_1AmFqeGZ4M1Uv5JyqKwlk/edit).

Pending https://github.com/ampproject/meta-ac/issues/31.

No, we should probably transfer this issue and others to the AC.

Yeah, I think this was about the governance document which [states](https://github.com/ampproject/meta/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md#membership) (emphasis mine): > Membership on the Advisory Committee shall include representatives from major AMP constituencies (Collaborators, Contributors, Users and...

Also worth noting: https://gist.github.com/cramforce/d522276ff59e8bda97b9b7218e06a468

- user story / user research behind new features (there was existing issue from last year). - connecting with standard bodies (W3C/WHATWG/IETF). - identify best practices in standard bodies and...