Tobie Langel

This boils down to how each different WG does versioning, which unfortunately, W3C doesn't want to standardize.

Somewhat related to https://github.com/tobie/specref/issues/463

FWIW: I think aliasing css-cascade to css-cascade-4 is perfectly acceptable.

Manually to biblio.js seems like the easiest option.

/cc @tabatkins

That's neat! Might try to reuse it. Note it's the output format, not the input one.

Well, not really. You need to understand the input format for contributions beyond the simplest of cases.

So Specref will balk over duplicate URLs. ~~I don't have a good solution for this issue, tbh. :-/~~

I've thought this through a little more and can now expand on my previous comment a bit. First of all, fragment URLs aren't considered as duplicates so you should be...

> My meta-question is whether there are any rules of what should / shouldn't be submitted as references. Sounds like it's not really formal and it's more common sense and...