Liav A.
Liav A.
A big pull-rebase-fixup-send cycle is on the way.
Last thing to do before we can merge this is to ensure that the `UserspaceEmulator` can be used on x86-64. Then we can get rid of x86-i386 for good :)
> Rebased this on latest master. Let's get this in. No need to block it on UserspaceEmulator supporting x86_64, that work will happen when it happens. :) I agree with...
As soon as CI is green let's get this merged @trflynn89 :)
> > Exactly for the reason you wrote, it was decided to drop i686 support. By using 32 bit software on a 64-bit capable machine you just limit yourself to...
> Looks reasonable design-wise, for now I just annotated the stuff that I noticed at a glance. We will definitely have to proof it against weird inputs a bit, but...
Rebased after CI flakes occurred.
This is not stale.
I figured that there's a flaw in this design - apparently two processes could use a single `BlockDevice` in a race condition to create two separate `FileSystem` objects to be...
Until I figure out how to fix this design, let's close this.