Simon Poole

You can append it to the issue.

There's no hurry.


We explicitly do not maintain relation membership when copying objects as this is the least surprising and "harmless" option. With other words this is working as intended. I might consider...

Well it is "only a small matter of programming" ... and testing, given that this is notoriously easy to get wrong. But it is a low use edge case which...

Well, no guarantees, but I'll have a look at it.

- [ ] allow panning over date line - [ ] split download bounding boxes - [ ] figure out how to handle ways crossing the dateline (perhaps with two...

Note that you can select an object via intent http://vespucci.io/tutorials/vespucci_intents/ and if you add a nonsense string as the to select object it will lead to nothing being selected.

Well typically it will be the last file you had loaded, that really shouldn't be an issue that everybody else has to suffer under.

The problem here is that this would be the "normal" undo functionality, so nothing to stop you from going back as far as you like, which wouldn't seem to make...