Selwin Ong

So the good news is that the in development version of RQ actually solves a few issues discussed in this thread. > This issue is about failing a job from...

I'm ok with this change. Do you mind opening a PR for this?

Remember to take backwards compatibility into account. If there are dependencies, you'll need to first check the sorted set before falling back to the older set structure.

Adding the necessary hooks to make implementing custom worker classes easier is definitely welcome. May I suggest renaming the methods to `setup_job_timeout` and `cancel_job_timeout` though? We also need to find...

It's great to see all this. Perhaps we should document these alternative worker packages in http://python-rq.org . What do you think @nvie ? I looked briefly at @zhangliyong's package and...

Hmm I'm not sure. Are you able to add logging statements somewhere around here to see what's going on? https://github.com/rq/rq/blob/master/rq/worker.py#L850 Is this only happening on a single server? 1.8.1 has...

PR welcome :)

I like solution B with option 1. PR for this would be great :)

We don't have such a concept in RQ yet. You can however create a job that depends on multiple other jobs before it gets executed.

> This is a slightly different question, but is there a way to create dependent jobs that run regardless of whether the dependencies failed or not? Quite a few of...