Sam Clegg

Well from what I could tell emscripten doesn't really support this feature. I will investigate what alon mentioned about the the `namedGlobals` used in dynamic linking. But from my investigations...

Do you mean giving JS access the named globals that are defined by wasm? That would be great. Is that a feature that would be useful in general to emscripten...

Yes, I imagine we could be doing somthing like EXPORTED_FUNCTIONS to choose which globals to export. If fact it looks like there used to be something called EXPORTED_GLOBALS in emscripten...

I think its more than just the performance issue. The fundamental units the the wasm linker is working with are segments and functions, not sections, so I still think there...

I was considering basically the same thing. I was going to call it `Chunk`, and I was thinking we could group relocations within a reloc section. So we don't need...

The only wrinkle is that we might want to handle sections that are not split into chunks too. Perhaps Chunk 0 can be used in this case?

I think its fairly subjective. The windows support is probably the most significant reason to switch. But also, non of those issues are really blocking progress or holding is back...

As you might have guessed I'm not a huge fan of cmake.. but I don't know of any good alternatives. I would imagine that converting to cmake could make things...

Sounds like a good plan, although I'm not sure about the use of the new target triples. In the past we have talked about trying not to let all our...

> Correct -- they'll only need to rebuild if they want to use the new Preview 2-only features. Wouldn't they even need to rebuild the object files though? I'm assuming...